Tampilkan postingan dengan label Hacking. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Hacking. Tampilkan semua postingan
10 Developments That Changed The Face Of Computing
The Stories Behind 15 of the Most Dangerous Hackers Ever
Adrian Lamo
Jeanson James Ancheta
ASTRA
Owen Thor Walker
Kevin Poulsen
Albert Gonzalez
Kevin Mitnick
Jonathan James
Vladimir Levin
Gary McKinnon
Michael Calce
Matthew Bevan and Richard Pryce
Syrian Electronic Army
Lizard Squad
Anonymous
10-Year-Old Kid Wins $10,000 for Successfully Hacking Instagram
Maisie Williams Manages to Crash a Game of Thrones Viewing Party Without Going Blind or Killing Anyone
Climategate detective: 'I'm deeply disappointed' we didn't catch hacker | Leo Hickman
Norfolk police's Julian Gregory explains why investigation into the University of East Anglia's hacked emails was so complex
On Wednesday, Norfolk Police announced that it was formally ending its two-and-a-half-year investigation into the theft of thousands of private emails stored on servers at the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU) – an event that has commonly come to be known as "Climategate".
Detective chief superintendent Julian Gregory, the senior investigating officer, said that due to the three-year statutory limitation placed on the investigation by the Computer Misuse Act 1990, he was closing the case now because there was no realistic chance of bringing a prosecution ahead of the third anniversary of the theft in November. He did say, though, that the "the data breach was the result of a sophisticated and carefully orchestrated attack" and that there was no evidence to suggest that anyone working at or associated with UEA was involved in the crime".
Norfolk Police gave a press conference yesterday in which it revealed some more details about the investigation. For example, DCS Gregory said that the hacker(s) had, whilst accessing the university's servers remotely via the internet, breached several passwords in order to gain access to the emails and other documents. He also said that officers had examined CCTV footage at CRU to investigate the possibility – subsequently ruled out - that a member of staff might have been involved.
DCS Gregory confirmed, too, that it was highly unlikely to have been a chance discovery by a hacker. It was a targeted attack. No other university in the UK experienced a similar attack over that same time period, he confirmed. (The hackers breached CRU's servers "certainly more than three times" between September and November 2009.) There was no evidence, he said, that the hack was committed, or commissioned, by a government or an individual/organisation with commercial interests.
He added: "This appears to have been done with the intention of influencing the global debate on climate change and ultimately that affects us all. To not have done the best we could on this investigation would have been neglect."
I was unable to attend the press conference in person. (Norfolk Police has produced a transcript of the press conference as a PDF, as well as broader background information here.) But yesterday afternoon I was able to put some further questions to DCS Gregory over the telephone...
Was the level of expertise required to pull of this kind of hack way beyond the kind of knowledge of, say, someone working in an IT department, or very familiar with computers, might have?
Yes, absolutely.
What is the hard evidence that you actually recovered?
Our technical investigation focused on CRUWEB8 [the web server that was first accessed by the hacker] and CRUBACK3 [a back-up server containing the emails which was accessed via CRUWEB8]. We identified the attacks that came in and their methodologies and some of the activities they undertook. The proxy servers they used either don't have the log switched on, or if they do they are overwritten within 24-48 hours. Hackers tend to choose proxy servers in countries where law enforcement agencies might find it challenging to get co-operation, or to get information. From the outset, you're almost on a hiding to nothing, to be perfectly frank.
So all that early speculation that a Russian server was involved so it must be a Russian, etc, was meaningless speculation?
Absolutely. We're not getting into naming countries, but I think it's fair to say that most continents were involved. As you know, you can be sitting on your computer, and causing something to happen on the other side of the world with a few clicks of the mouse.
Did the hackers try to manipulate the back-up server in anyway – delete any information, change timecodes etc? Or did they just go in, copy what they wanted, and leave?
They certainly tried to alter the web server – the web logs – and try to leave a false trail. They got into certain elements of the log-in system and deleted and created certain commands. That kind of activity.
Did they try to make it look like someone internal had accessed the server?
I'm speculating now, but I don't think they thought we'd get as far as we did in terms of finding out some of the things they'd done. But I think they tried to leave some things that they thought would mislead us or point us in the wrong direction.
We did have some conversations with one or two specialists, but, to be honest, we didn't think it was going to take us anywhere productive, partly because if we took it at face value, say, linguistically, it could have been falsified. And even it was accurate, where does that take us? Because in the context of the investigation it wouldn't have helped. We did start to look at the trail in terms of the publishing, but again, you get into jurisdictional issues , different legal systems etc.
Late last year, you seized the computers of Roger Tattersall (aka "Tallbloke"), after a link to the second tranche of emails was posted on his blog. Were you just looking for an IP address?
Yes. Initially, we wanted to make sure he wasn't involved in way, but we wanted to see if we could get anything from his computers which might help.
Was there anything else other than the link being left on his blog that made him a suspect?
No. We were just following that trail. [The police later confirmed that Tattersall was not a suspect and returned his computers following a forensic inspection.]
Was there anything forensically similar between the release in 2009 and 2011?
A similar MO [modus operandi] was employed – hosted then linked to from other places – but in terms of the data it all came from CRUBACK3 and we were satisfied it had all come from the original attack, or same series of attacks.
Is there any advance in knowledge on the encrypted file said to contain the rest of the emails?
No.
Did you ever draw on international expertise, say, a US law enforcement agency?
We used UK-based assets, both police and private sector.
Is there an on-going investigation in the US, say, by the Department of Justice?
I'm a little unclear on that, to be honest.
If a third release occurred, would you reopen the investigation?
No, very unlikely. Not least because, come the autumn, the time limit will have passed for any prosecution. The crime committed was obtaining the data in the first place.
So they have got away with it, haven't they?
Essentially, yes. Much to our disappointment, of course.
It sounds as if much of the activity occurred within the first weeks and months of the investigation. What has happened over the last couple of years in terms of staffing etc? Have you been waiting for a new lead?
The investigation has been active, but in a way when we do some activity we are in the hands of people in other jurisdictions. So there have been some considerable delays. You go through the process and accepted method internationally of getting support for an investigation, but depending on the country in question, it depends upon the speed with which that happens, and effectiveness with which it happens.
Would that process basically involve asking to get hold of an IP address held on a server?
It would include that. But we also took the step where we openly engaged with talking to people in a structured way and see if they had anything to tell us. [It is known that the police interviewed by phone and email a range of people based abroad, such as climate sceptic bloggers and climate scientists.] At the end of the day, we didn't have any clear suspects so we were seeking information.
So, there was never a shortlist of suspects?
No.
So, you never targeted any, say, climate sceptics who were closely involved with the freedom of information requests submitted to CRU and, therefore, might know what was likely to be held on those servers and, therefore, have a possible motivation to get hold of it?
No. The focus of the investigation was let's start where the crime is and work out from there. Ultimately, unless you find that breadcrumb trail that takes you to somebody, you're never going to get a prosecution off the ground in reality. If you're dealing with a property crime and someone had got the stolen property on their premises, then you've got something to go on. But just because someone has a copy of "FOIA2009" or "FOIA2011" [the file names given by the hacker to the email releases in 2009 and 2011] on their computer, it means nothing because it's been mirrored all over the world.
Did you quickly rule out anyone from the university being involved?
It was the focus of the first few months to go through that option. But our primary line of inquiry was always the technology. We did work through everyone at UEA looking for the obvious, but once we'd achieved that that was mothballed.
Did the e-crimes unit say this was routine, run-of-the-mill hacking, or something more specialised or skilled?
Some things you might describe as standard. Using proxy servers, trying to change records on the systems to conceal your tracks – they might be called standard. But because of the varying nature of ICT infrastructure I think it's quite difficult to say that a particular MO stands out, or is distinctly similar to another attack. Most hackers will use the standard techniques we've discussed. I don't think there's anything which would make it similar to anything else. What they did conclude was that the activities that had been carried out indicated a high level of expertise and competence.
Did you interview any students, as opposed to just staff at UEA?
No. As you can imagine, the university is quite significant in size. It goes back to this being a proportionate investigation and finding a line of enquiry most likely to take us somewhere. We didn't engage on that kind of speculation. We dealt with some students within CRU, but we limited it to that.
Have you kept on top of all the internet speculation and commentary surrounding this case?
Firstly, you can't investigate what's said online. Secondly, you look at those blogs and most of it is speculative, uninformed and, occasionally, ridiculous.
But did you keep an eye on it in case someone came up with a possible lead or sensible theory, or did you see it as nonsense and a distraction?
The latter. I think it was Steven Mosher who said he knew who it was, or had a theory, at least. Maybe he does. Maybe he doesn't. Where does that take you? And is he likely to tell the police? The difference between the police and, say, journalists, is that we won't embark on a number of lines of enquiry because, ultimately, you can see that in terms of getting to where we need to get to - which is beyond reasonable doubt - it's not going to get you there. The fact that things are "interesting" is not always enough.
Did you and UEA collaborate in terms of announcing the end of the investigation? [Both put out press statements at the same time which linked to each other.]
We've always had a working relationship, as you would expect because they were the victims of the crime. But we obviously have different perspectives. What we said in our statement was what we wanted to say. The coordination part was along the lines of "you may want to say something and it would be sensible to coordinate that". That's not to say we wouldn't be mindful of their perspective on things, in the same way they'd be mindful of ours, if that makes sense.
Why did you feel that you had to add the statement about it not being the work of a whistleblower, knowing that this was a big question mark hanging over all this?
I always find some of the conspiracy theories mildly amusing, because anyone who knows anything about British policing knows that sort of level of collusion just doesn't happen. The reality is we knew it would be the first question asked. When you put together a press release you try to address the issues that people are going to ask you about so, given that was at the forefront of a number of people's minds, we thought we'd address that. All I can do is say how it is. We've found no evidence to implicate anyone from UEA and the nature of the attack – the level of sophistication – leads me to a hypothesis that it was very unlikely to be someone from UEA. I can't say 100% it wasn't. Of course, I can't. Unless you find the person responsible, and have clear evidence to implicate them, then you can't 100% eliminate other people.
Has it been a deeply frustrating case to work on?
Most investigations I work on are difficult as that's the nature of my business. But this one has been unique, certainly for Norfolk Constabulary, but probably nationally, possibly even internationally. It's been very interesting, but also challenging. And at a personal level I'm deeply disappointed we haven't reached a successful conclusion. The only thing I can say on behalf of myself and the team is that I'm very comfortable that we did everything we reasonably could have done to try and find out who was responsible.
Where you working under a particular budgetary constraint? If you'd thrown, say, 50 officers at this, would it have made much difference?
There are always budgetary considerations in any investigation. It's public money, after all. But were there any unnecessary restrictions that hindered the investigation? Then, no. In fact, quite the contrary. When we started the investigation, it was escalated to the highest level. We deemed it a "Category A" investigation, which is the highest in terms of public-interest resources. It was well supported by our Gold Group, which is strategic oversight and support to an investigation that you don't typically instigate for every case. Their role is to make sure I've got what I need. Throughout, I've felt well-supported. I've not been able to not do something because of money.
- Hacked climate science emails
- Hacking
- Climate change
- Climate change
- Climate change scepticism
- University of East Anglia
- Police
- Computing
guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
Aaron Swartz's life when interviewed
Swartz turned his computer genius to political organizing and he became a champion of information sharing and online freedoms. But his activism didn't come without a cost: he faced 35 years in prison and $1 million in fines for downloading scholarly articles from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, leading to a two-year legal battle with the federal government that ended when Swartz took his own life on January 11, 2013. Soon after Swartz's death, director Brian Knappenberger, whose previous film was We Are Legion: The Story of the Hacktivists, began filming a documentary about his life. Although Knappenberger didn’t know Swartz personally, he was “inspired, infuriated and frustrated” by his suicide, and saw his life not only as a compelling film, but a call to action to continue the work Swartz had started. Bio talked to Knappenberger as he prepared for today's nationwide release of The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz. Do you think Aaron was largely a victim of circumstance? Or would the crack down on "computer crime" have inevitably snared him at some point, given his determination to push the envelope on matters of open access? I think you can’t separate Aaron’s story from the climate or the landscape in which it happened. Within a couple of weeks of Aaron’s arrest, WikiLeaks had released the diplomatic cables and the Afghan War logs and the PayPal 14 had conducted denial of service attacks against MasterCard, Visa and PayPal when those companies cut off financial services to WikiLeaks. It was also the beginning of the Arab Spring, and that year saw unprecedented hacker and hacktivist activity that ended with the Occupy movement. Time magazine’s Person of the Year was “The Protestor.” The year after that was the year of the crackdown and I do think Aaron got caught up in that. There was a kind of storm that happened with prosecutors being overzealous and a broken criminal justice system. He walked into that system where once that machinery got moving, it could never turn back. In the film, Aaron’s lawyer is confident he would have won the criminal case. Do you think he's right? I think he genuinely had reasons to believe that they were going to win, and that a lot of the main evidence that they were going to use against Aaron was going to be thrown out. Obviously this was very tough for Aaron because there was never going to be another plea deal. He had turned down all of the pleas, the trial was looming and the pressure was on. Aaron ended up committing suicide within a few days of the two-year anniversary of his first arrest, and I don’t think that’s a coincidence. He was only 26 when he died, but he accomplished so much in his brief life. What do you feel were Aaron’s greatest contributions? I think a lot of people are inspired by his early years when he was in his mid to late teens and was such a substantive contributor to the early Internet. That legacy will live on. But then he made a turn from a very rich, post-Reddit sale 19-year-old who was in this build-to-flip, money machine start-up culture to being a crusader for social justice. He started using Internet tools to build grassroots political movements that really put his skills toward the public good. And I think ultimately that is what a lot of people will take away from his story. Certainly, there are bigger problems to focus on too, problems with our criminal justice system, problems with the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, outdated computer laws. Why isn't there more of a push to reform the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the 1986 law the feds used to prosecute him? Who benefits from keeping the law in its current form? Specifically, who in the technology industry benefits? There was big movement to change the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act after Aaron died. One effort was called Aaron’s Law and honestly back at that point it looked like it was going to be pretty easy. Anybody who looks at this law can see that it’s nonsense. You don’t have to be technically inclined to know that we live in a different world now than we did in the 80s. The problem is that it is being stalled and a lot of tech companies have put up these hurdles that were unexpected. One of the [companies] that argued in those committees against changing the law were the representatives from Oracle. They liked that the law is kind of broad and vague and can be used for almost anything. You’d expect a little more support from the tech community, but in fact it’s quite the opposite. You're releasing your film under a Creative Commons license. What kind of free distribution, copying, and remixing will that allow? How will that affect your ability to recoup the investment in your film? The way were going to do this is the movie is going to be in theaters in 25 cities nationwide on June 27th. It’s also going to be on video on demand and there is going to be a Vimeo version that is Creative Commons that can be shared, but it can’t be shared commercially. We’ll see how it affects our ability to recoup. It was important to do for a lot of reasons, but principally for Aaron. I had a lot of offers at Sundance, but they had to comport to this or else I wasn’t going to take them even though they were, let’s just say, distracting. What issue or issues do you think Aaron might be focused on these days, were he alive? Well, who knows? You can look at Demand Progress [the Internet activist organization Aaron founded] to get a clue about that. But there are two issues where I wish we had his energy. The NSA overreach and these revelations of mass suspicion-less surveillance of American citizens. A lot of people see it as a huge overreach and encroachment on constitutional rights and civil liberties. I have a feeling that Aaron would have been a warrior in that battle. The other area is net neutrality – it is clear he would have been involved with that. It really looks like net neutrality might be going the way of the Atari system. What suggestions might you have for people who would like to honor and help further his legacy? I think you can get up to speed about Internet issues and why it’s important. The Internet isn’t just a realm of geeks and hackers. It’s the place where we live now, and so we have to import into this world all of the things that we think are important from traditional notions of civil liberties, freedom of speech and protection from being searched by our government without due process. I think people can get informed about that and take their Congress folk to task to learn about these issues before they legislate these issues. But in a broader personal sense think of what you can do for the public good. We all have skills. You don’t have to be a genius hacker. What can you do for public service and how can you make things better?
Police close ‘Climategate’ investigation
The Norfolk Constabulary has closed its investigation into the November 2009 release of private emails between researchers at the Climatic Research Centre (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in Norwich after failing to identify those responsible. Despite not being able to prosecute any offenders, the police have confirmed that the data breach “was the result of a sophisticated and carefully orchestrated attack on the CRU’s data files, carried out remotely via the internet”. The investigation has also cleared anyone working at or associated with UEA from involvement in the crime.
“Despite detailed and comprehensive enquiries, supported by experts in this field, the complex nature of this investigation means that we do not have a realistic prospect of identifying the offender or offenders and launching criminal proceedings within the time constraints imposed by law,” said Julian Gregory, the senior investigating officer on the case, which had been code-named Operation Cabin. “The international dimension of investigating the World Wide Web especially has proved extremely challenging.”
The hacking resulted in the release of more than 1,000 emails and shook the public’s trust in climate science, though independent investigations after the breach cleared the scientists of wrongdoing (see Nature‘s collected coverage of Climategate).
“We are naturally disappointed that those responsible for this crime have not been caught and brought to justice,” said Edward Acton, UEA’s vice chancellor, in a statement. “The misinformation and conspiracy theories circulating following the publication of the stolen emails – including the theory that the hacker was a disgruntled UEA employee — did real harm to public perceptions about the dangers of climate change.”
Phil Jones, research director of CRU, who spoke to Nature in February 2010 about the affair (see ‘Climategate’ scientist speaks out), said he hoped the end of the case would “draw a line under the stressful events of the last two and half years”.
“My colleagues and I remain committed to the research CRU undertakes to illuminate the globally important issue of climate change,” said Jones.
Phone hacking: former Sarah Ferguson aide sues News International
Kate Waddington, duchess's PR adviser for 20 years, among 50 people who have lodged claims against NoW publisher
A former aide to Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, is suing News International over allegations her phone was hacked by the News of the World.
Kate Waddington is a close confidante of Ferguson and acted as her public relations adviser and spokeswoman for 20 years.
She is among 50 individuals including Cherie Blair and Wayne Rooney who have lodged high court claims against the publisher.
Waddington, like all those suing News International over alleged hacking, has been shown notes kept on her by the private investigator at the centre of the scandal, Glenn Mulcaire.
The notes were made available under legal disclosure by the Metropolitan police and it is understood they show that her voicemail was frequently hacked into between 2004 and 2006.
Ferguson has been the target of countless News of the World exposés over the years, most recently the subject of an undercover operation mounted by Mazher Mahmood, who in 2010 filmed her offering access to her former husband, Prince Andrew, for £500,000.
Waddington knew nothing of the meeting and resigned after the News of the World published the story, but remains close to Ferguson and her daughters, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie.
Earlier this week, the high court heard that 417 people had now been given disclosure from the police in relation to Mulcaire.
About 100 of those are expected to go ahead with full legal action against News International by the August deadline set by Mr Justice Vos for the second tranche of civil suits against the publisher.
Vos made it clear at a case management hearing on Wednesday that he did not want to have a third tranche of civil proceedings against the publisher and has asked solicitors on both side to take an advert out in legal magazines instructing lawyers acting for potential victims to get their claims in on time.
• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly "for publication".
• To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook
guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
Vehicular Hacking, From Art Cars to JEEPuters
While DIY automotive projects are nothing new, the options for modifying your vehicle are becoming increasingly diverse and accessible. From Backyard Biodiesel production and vegetable-oil-powered motorcycles to solar panel augmented chassis and homemade RFID keyless entry, as the Owner’s Manifesto states, “If you can’t open it, you don’t own it,” and this should apply to your manufactured automobile as much as any commercial object. Continue reading for a few examples of vehicular hacking, from art cars to an Arduino-controlled Jeep!
This post is brought to you by the new OE Fine Wire Spark Plug line from Bosch.
An art car gone mad, the Sashimi Tabernacle Choir has long been a staple of Maker Faires from Austin to Detroit to New York. And with each appearance it might be different than the last, as this project undergoes “continuous modification and reprogramming.” For example, the control system, once ran with BASIC Stamp, now uses a Linux netbook’s web browser, giving the makers a visual GUI for choosing songs and animation sequences.
Wanting a truck with more power options, Mechanical Mashup maker Dave re-wires and hacks a Black & Decker power inverter to reside in the panel between his truck’s driver and passenger seats. As they say in their video podcast, “cars aren’t keeping up with technology,” and it’s up to makers to hack their vehicles to suit their needs. And sometimes all you need is a lot more power!
Hamburg-based maker Alexander Weber detailed his Race Car POV at his tinkerlog blog. After experimenting for a year with a couple prototypes, the drive-by results are pretty fantastic!
Here is my Jeep wrangler that I outfitted with a couple Arduinos, a bunch of relays and some swtiches. Basically a computerized power box for the jeep. It runs all of my accessories along with lights and even starts the jeep with only a code! Has light sensors to automatically turn on the lights and can tell the time and temp.
Ed’s Arduino-powered Jeep Wrangler shows what is possible when a maker wants to extensively modify their vehicle’s interior and functions with an Arduino! His first experiment with that microcontroller platform, this 11-minute video walkthrough shows everything from temperature display to controlling his garage’s lights and door from inside his vehicle. He even modded his ignition to the push of a button!
Instead of a car with mods, this car is the mod. Vehicular hacking taken to its logical conclusion, this car is part of an emerging trend of homemade diesel and electric motor vehicles. Best of all, the Roopod is also completely street legal! This auto has managed to squeeze out an incredible 78 miles per gallon, and the maker suspects that number could be improved upon.
Operation Tuleta: Sun journalist arrested in hacking investigation
News reporter Rhodri Phillips arrested at 6.30am by Scotland Yard detectives at his home in north London
A journalist at the Sun has been arrested in north London by police from Scotland Yard's Operation Tuleta, which is investigating breaches of privacy including computer hacking.
He is understood to be Rhodri Phillips, a news reporter at the paper.
The Metropolitan police said the man was held at his home at 6.30am on Thursday, but did not give his age or any detail of offences the man is suspected of committing.
News International chief executive Tom Mockridge confirmed in an email to staff that he was "afraid that another of our journalists from the Sun has been arrested this morning".
Scotland Yard is expected to provide further detail of the arrest later on Thursday.
The force said in a statement: "For operational reasons we are not providing further details of this arrest at this time but will release more information in due course."
Sources at News International said the arrest may have been linked to an incident last year when Philips worked as night reporter when a reader phoned in claiming to have found a mobile phone on a train they believed belonged to an MP.
Scotland Yard said in a statement officers from Operation Tuleta were investigating criminal breaches of privacy alongside their phone-hacking inquiries.
The Met police refused to elaborate on the actual offence the individual was arrested on suspicion of or give further details.
Colleagues on the paper are furious about the arrest and say the paper has been handed information and lost items "since 1969" when Murdoch bought the title.
"If we have to stop taking calls like this and checking out the information that is being put to us, we might as well pack up and go home," said one journalist on the paper. "This is just getting ridiculous."
The move has reawakened the anger in the Sun newsroom felt in February when Trevor Kavanagh, the paper's associate editor, said there was "a feeling of being under siege" after five Sun journalists were arrested – and bailed – in relation to Scotland Yard's Operation Elveden investigation into allegations of inappropriate payments to public officials for stories. "The witch-hunt has put us behind ex-Soviet states on free press," he said.
Phillips is the seventh person to be held by the Metropolitan police under Operation Tuleta, which was launched in July last year as a splinter investigation to the probe into phone hacking.
The Met has 19 officers working on Operation Tuleta, compared with 96 officers officers and civilian personnel on Operation Weeting and 70 on Operation Elveden, the investigation into payments by journalists to police and public officials.
Scotland Yard described the Tuleta probe as "an investigation into a number of allegations referring to breaches of privacy which fall outside the remit of Operation Weeting. This includes computer hacking."
Operation Tuleta is investigating the use of so-called "trojan" emails which allow a hacker to take over a target's computer.
• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly "for publication".
• To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook
- Operation Tuleta
- Newspapers & magazines
- National newspapers
- Newspapers
- Press intrusion
- Hacking
- Computing
- Crime
guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)